CD-ROM
Pengaruh Setback pada Bangunan Tanah Gempa terhadap Gaya Gempa, Kinerja, Kekuatan dan Daktilitas Struktur (CD + Cetak)
High-rise structure buildings in Indonesia are generally said to be prone to earthquake loads. Besides being prone to earthquake loads, in building planning there is a form of irregular structure modeling, one of which is the setback building. Setback buildings lead to differences in mass and stiffness that are not evenly distributed so that there are differences in stress concentrations at certain points that result in the destruction of the structure.
In this thesis discusses the effect of setback on earthquake forces, performance, strength, and structure ductility. There are four building structure models with setback variations analyzed. The four models that were designed had a building length of 20 m and a building width of 16 m, with a shifting floor setbackt 4 m and a building height of 32 m or 8 floors. Analysis of the model uses standard planning SNI 03-2847-2013, lateral earthquake analysis based on SNI 1726-2012 and structural analysis using SAP2000 v.20.
The results of the evaluation of the influence of the setback building on buildings without setback is the lateral earthquake style setback model with 3 times the floor shift (setback 3) has the greatest earthquake force with a percentage of 16.11%. Then the service boundary performance (KBL) and the ultimate limit performance (KBU) setback model with 3 times of floor shift (setback 3) have the greatest performance with a percentage of 40.89%. While the strength of the beam setback with 2 times the floor shift (setback 2) has the greatest strength with a percentage of 98.49%. The strength of the setback model column with 1 floor shift (setback 1) has the greatest strength with a percentage of 65.95%. The beam ductility of the setback model with 2 times of floor shift (setback 2) and the setback model with 3 times of floor shift (setback 3) have the same ductility with a percentage of 32.93% and the ductility of the setback model column with 3 times of floor shift (setback 3) has greatest ductility with a percentage of 1281.96%. From the results obtained indicate that, all three models have an effect due to the setback. So that the setback model that has a great risk of structural collapse is the setbackt model with 3 times of floor shift (setback 3) compared to the setback model with 1 floor shift (setback 1) as the best setback model.
Keywords: Setback, Lateral Earthquake Force, Performance, Strength and Ductility of Structures.
Tidak tersedia versi lain